In many ways, it
was doomed from the start. Sure, it had a beautifully taken photograph; yes,
the parchment around the edges was perfectly crisped and browned; and indeed,
those lemon slices looked caramelized and tart and toothsome. It could have
gone a different way. Perhaps if I hadn’t been in the process of moving
box-loads of historical relics out of my apartment, I might have been paying
closer attention to things—I may have been able to intervene earlier on. But it
had to happen, one of these days: that I would bake something that wouldn’t
live up to its cookbook portrait, that needed serious modification, that was,
perhaps, well intentioned, but not quite able to fulfill.
Today, my
friends, apparently, is that day.
I knew from the
start that I probably shouldn’t be baking another loaf cake. I had this one success a
couple of weeks ago, and I should have left it at that for a bit. I was
planning to offer you the following by way of excuses for this next loaf cake: (1) this one is made with
butter not olive oil, and so we could compare and contrast; (2) I am
defenseless before Nigel Slater and his beautiful photographs, and his brief
jots of writing, and the way in which he chronicles, so simply, in so unadorned
a way, the pleasures of cooking and eating; and (3) I’ve been reading way too
much lately about the Great War.
I know that this
last bit may come as a shock to any sane, mildly intelligent person out there. What
on earth does loaf cake have to do with the Great War? Well, the answer, of course, is nothing
really, nothing whatsoever. But I’ve been reading this book, primarily
because I can’t seem to focus my mind on the sort of reading that I usually do, and in this book (which is really quite wonderful, actually)
there is this section about the kinds of things that British troops at the
front received as care packages while they were away at war. They received
letters, and photographs, and news from home, of course, but they also received
food—all manner of
perishable and nonperishable things, including tarts, cakes, eggs, butter,
fruit, and even fresh flowers “for the table” (specifically, violets and
primroses). The idea of this passage is to point out the incredibly ironic,
terribly sad, entirely ghastly proximity of these soldiers to their homes in
England. They were at the front on the Sommes or in Amiens or in Ypres, but
they were often just several hours away from home, a place that could be
reached by boat along the Channel, and that was, in many cases, close enough to
receive cakes and tarts from. This section of the book contains numerous
humorous anecdotes about the sorts of food items that the troops received,
including one letter from a captain in which he instructs his wife to package
all future fruit tarts that she ships to him in cardboard rather than tin. (“I…
received your parcel quite safe… I am sorry to say though that the tart had
gone bad. I was so mad as I just felt like a bit of tart then too. I think the
tin box done it. I don’t think a tin box is as good as a cardboard box or wood
box for something in the tart line.”)
I won’t go on
and on about this, but suffice it to say that it got me thinking: what could
one make that would be sturdy enough to ship a long way, if one were pressed to
the task? I might, I thought to myself, occasionally have something that I
would like to send by the post; something that would hopefully arrive in one
piece and that would still be delicious—perhaps even more delicious than when it was first baked?—once
it got there. I settled on the idea of a loaf cake. And, specifically, this
loaf cake, by Nigel Slater, with its lemon and brown sugar promises, its
drizzle of lemon syrup, its luscious appearance, glossy finish, and
parchment-wrapped exterior. This thing looked like it was built to travel.
Perhaps it would be the kind of baked good that one could ship on, say,
Mother’s Day, or for a friend’s birthday.
But alas, no.
Not really at all.
Of course, I did
just try it when it was first out of the oven; I haven’t given it time to
settle yet; and I haven’t given myself time to warm up to it—but it’s not
usually a good sign when one is not overcome with excitement with the thing
that one has just baked. The just-out-of-the-oven moment should be filled with
blissful enthusiasm, pride, satisfaction, and fulfillment—not sighs, frowns,
and a scrunched, quizzical brow.
But I’m giving
you the wrong idea here. It’s not a bad cake exactly, it’s just not amazing, and I find it to be
too sweet. I’m also not singing home the praises of the lemon and brown sugar
combination, though I really thought I would be. And it’s a little too sticky,
and not in a way that I find appealing. To Nigel’s credit (and I do feel that
he deserves a lot of credit; I may have been entirely to blame for the outcome
of this cake), I did make one significant modification—I cut the amount of
butter nearly by half. But I just couldn’t see, when it came down to it, how on
earth I was going to be able to put 4 sticks of butter into a loaf cake—4 sticks
of butter!! I consulted some other pound cake recipes and found that 2 sticks
seemed to be a more generally accepted number, so that’s what I used.
Granted, I
probably should have adjusted some other proportions once I made this change
(for instance, the quantity of sugar), and I didn’t. I take full
responsibility.
Next time, if
there was going to be a next time, I would increase the amount of ground
almonds, use a mixture of brown and granulated sugars, and perhaps I would even
use oil instead of butter.
My favorite part
of this cake is the lovely garnish of sliced lemons that adorns the top of it
in a sort of haphazard meander. It’s a beautiful, rustic touch. And those lemon
slices have been simmered in brown sugar and water, giving them a slightly
caramelized quality and a beautiful, glimmering sheen. I like what this cake
strives for. I like what the garnish beckons for it.
Maybe one day
I’ll revisit it. For now, make this instead.